By Vinod Vasudevan, Global CTO MDR & Deputy Global CTO – Cybersecurity Services, Atos

The blind spot

The key challenge that SOCs have today is detecting advanced attacks early and responding rapidly.   Advanced attacks use newer techniques or significant variation of an existing one,hence these attacks cannot be detected using previously known signatures. Similarly, threat actors are getting better at camouflaging or launching attacks from compromised systems of a legitimate organization. This defeats threat intelligence-based detection using IoCs including IP/ULR/email IDs/ Usernames. There is a blind spot for conventional security technologies where it is an unknown attack and an unknown threat actor.

The value of AI for detection of blind spots

AI can throw light on this blind spot and enable detection. AI can do this by profiling known good behavior and detecting deviations from these baselines. As an example, using AI we can profile a normal/admin user for systems of allowed access, data size, time of access (time of day, week). An attacker who compromises this user will show different access patterns that can be detected as an anomaly using AI algorithms. Such profiling can be used to detect lateral movement, data exfiltration. AI can also be used to learn from known malicious behavior when enough data samples are available. This is true for detection of malware binaries. Deep learning algorithms can be used to learn from millions of malware samples available to detect malware even if new or hitherto unknown malware.

More effective response capabilities and interconnected SOCs

As we step into the future, AI algorithms can also be used to learn successful response mechanisms used to contain & orchestrate a successful ransomware response. This will lead to autonomous response that can trigger response steps in real time to contain major attacks and ensure that business impact is reduced. AI can also give much better results as we create, interconnect and strengthen national and regional Security Operation Centers (SOCs) of critical infrastructure or functions at national and EU level. Interconnected SOCs can provide more data for AI algorithms to learn from and learning can be transferred across SOCs to democratize the detection and response capabilities.

AI is key to face an ever-evolving threat landscape

Cyber crime syndicates have already started using AI for launching targeted attacks. The use of AI makes it easy to launch personalized attacks at scale. This also means that we cannot depend only on rule based approach to counter AI driven attacks. We cannot afford armies of highly scarce Cyber Security professionals to staff SOCs. The use of AI in SOC will enable automation of human actions, emulate human intelligence in analysis/response and enable the scale required for successful response to such AI driven attacks.

The future is towards using AI for tactical scale in combination with Human Intelligence for strategic actions for combating the ever-evolving complex threat landscape.

You may also like

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter

The transition to post-quantum cryptography is not a future problem — it is a present one. The threat of adversaries harvesting encrypted data today for decryption once quantum computing matures means that organizations with long-lived data and systems are already exposed. Waiting for cryptographically relevant quantum computers to arrive before acting is not a viable risk management strategy.



Exposure is not uniform across sectors. Financial services, government and defense, operational technology, and healthcare face the sharpest quantum risk, driven by decades-long data retention obligations, slow system replacement cycles, and the societal consequences of cryptographic failure. For these sectors, PQC readiness has moved from best practice to strategic imperative.



Globally, the direction of travel is clear. The United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Singapore, and Australia have each established structured PQC transition frameworks, with mandatory deadlines converging around the late 2020s and 2030. Organizations operating across jurisdictions should expect compounding compliance requirements and align migration plans accordingly.



At the same time, the geopolitical dimension of PQC standardization is becoming increasingly salient. The emergence of a “splinternet” infrastructure, characterized by regionally fragmented digital ecosystems, suggests that cryptographic standards diverge along political and strategic lines. As a result, organizations must not only manage technical migration but also navigate a politically charged landscape in which interoperability, regulatory alignment, and long-term cryptographic agility become critical strategic considerations.



This paper offers a comparative overview of regional PQC transition frameworks and identifies the business and systemic risks associated with quantum-vulnerable cryptography, providing insights for organizations preparing for the transition to post-quantum cryptography. Overall, PQC migration is a strategic transformation, not a technical patch. Cryptographic inventory, governance structures, crypto-agility, and supply chain engagement are as central to success as algorithm selection — and organizations that treat PQC readiness as an architectural and organizational challenge will be best positioned as quantum risks continue to mature.
April 07, 2026
•
A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition

The Charter of Trust is taking decisive steps to secure our digital future in the quantum era. As quantum computing advances, the risks to today’s cryptographic systems grow ever more urgent. Our dedicated working group is leading the way in raising awareness, promoting standards-based migration, and fostering collaboration across industries, governments, and academia. Together, we are committed to a proactive, well-coordinated, and risk-driven transition to post-quantum cryptography—ensuring digital trust and resilience for generations to come. Discover our vision and join us as we shape a secure digital world for the quantum age.
November 03, 2026
•
Read the Charter's contribution to the European Commission's public consultation on the Digital Omnibus Package
icon Artificial Intelligence

Read the Charter's contribution to the European Commission's public consultation on the Digital Omnibus Package

The rapid expansion of EU digital regulation has strengthened security, privacy, and trust, but it has also created overlapping obligations, inconsistent timelines, and administrative complexity. The Digital Omnibus Package provides a timely opportunity to streamline these rules, ensure greater coherence, and enable businesses to focus resources on resilience and innovation rather than redundant compliance tasks.
The Charter of Trust welcomes the Commission’s initiative to harmonize digital regulations across the EU, aiming to reduce administrative burdens while maintaining high standards of security and privacy. Representing the unified views of its Partners, this paper addresses all key legislation within the scope of the Digital Omnibus and offers comprehensive recommendations. It emphasizes the need for a unified incident reporting system, risk-based notification requirements, and fair compliance processes to minimize regulatory overlap. The Charter calls for clearer liability clauses, global recognition of certifications, and stronger supply chain security.
In data regulation, the Charter advocates ensuring alignment between the rules on data intermediation services under the DGA and B2B data sharing under the Data Act and extending exemptions to mid-cap companies, all while safeguarding trade secrets. For artificial intelligence, the paper recommends a phased approach to new requirements, integrated conformity assessments, harmonized compliance templates, and clear definitions, supported by sector-specific guidance and transparent AI categorization. The Charter also encourages the European Commission to ensure that ePrivacy reform is future-proof, fosters innovation, and reflects the needs of both businesses and consumers. Finally, it recommends robust security standards and cross-border recognition for the EU Business Wallet, with industry involvement in technical standards and integration with data access systems.
Collectively, these measures are designed to foster innovation, resilience, and trust in the EU’s digital landscape, allowing businesses to thrive in a coherent and future-ready regulatory environment.
October 14, 2025
•