By Zachary Thoreson, Cybersecurity Threat Intelligence Analyst, Global Cyber Security Team, AES

The threat landscape for ransomware is constantly changing with evolving variants and the seemingly endless game of Whack-a-Mole with digital crime gangs. With the Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) model becoming more popular, ransomware gangs provide a cut of the profit to individuals able to infect organizations with ransomware and generate payment. The motivation behind the attacks continue to remain financially driven resulting in the attacks being purely opportunistic with plenty of profit to be shared with an average payout around $170,000 per attack[i]. In an analysis by Chainalysis, ransomware attacks amassed a total of $406 million in 2020 and are on pace to further increase in 2021[ii]. As ransomware gangs become more ambitious in their targeting, they have drawn the increased attention of governments around the world.

Flying too close to the sun

While profits soar, the greed may result in the downfall of some ransomware groups. In early May, as was widely reported, the DarkSide criminal organization leveraged a compromised account to access and deploy ransomware to the Colonial Pipeline’s computer networks. The attack brought the critical fuel pipeline to a halt for days resulting in fuel shortages and consumer panic. However, the attack gained a large amount of unwanted attention for the group. As a result, DarkSide released a statement stating the affiliate program is closed and that the group would no longer be operating[iii]. The unwanted publicity to ransomware activity also resulted in a major Russian-language cyber criminal forum, XSS, to ban ransomware related commerce on its website[iv]. It is apparent that the attack resulted in much more attention than the group realized or wanted.

At the same time another ransomware gang, Conti, paralyzed Ireland’s Health Service in a ransomware attack against critical IT infrastructure. The gang provided the Health Service a decryption key, but still holds the compromised data for ransom[v]. Conti and DarkSide both have broken unspoken rules within the underground community of not attacking high profile infrastructure or healthcare entities – moves that will bring a large amount of attention to ransomware activity.

Authorities push back

The US Department of Justice was able recover a portion of the $4.4 million dollar ransomware payment made to DarkSide. The newly established Ransomware and Digital Extortion task force was able to obtain the decryption key of the cryptocurrency account holding the ransom funds, a rare victory in the fight against ransomware gangs. In addition, increased pressure has been placed on the Biden administration ahead of the Geneva summit to confront Russian president Vladimir Putin regarding the haven Russia has created for ransomware gangs[vi]. The UK government has also urged organizations affected not to pay ransoms citing no guarantee for a successful outcome and lack of protection in the future[vii].

What’s next?

Until there is a robust ability to intercept funds traveling cryptocurrency exchanges, more international effort in arresting ransomware gangs and support from agencies in incident response and remediation need to occur.  If these principles are not established, ransomware attacks will continue to be profitable. Thwarting ransomware gangs will take an international effort from organizations and authorities alike.

In the meantime, organizations should continue to adhere to cybersecurity best practices. Leveraging multi-factor authentication, strong password practices, and ensuring timely patch management cycles all help increase resiliency to ransomware attacks. Limiting the external attack surface area is vital in preventing a compromise. The Charter of Trust continues to promote security awareness and facilitate information sharing of trends and practices to improve cybersecurity posture internationally.

____________________

References:

[i] https://www.sophos.com/en-us/press-office/press-releases/2021/04/ransomware-recovery-cost-reaches-nearly-dollar-2-million-more-than-doubling-in-a-year.aspx

[ii] https://www.coindesk.com/ransomware-attacks-are-growing-more-profitable-chainalysis-says

[iii] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/14/business/darkside-pipeline-hack.html

[iv] https://threatpost.com/darkside-toshiba-xss-bans-ransomware/166210/

[v] https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/conti-ransomware-gives-hse-ireland-free-decryptor-still-selling-data/

[vi] https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/07/politics/president-joe-biden-cyber-attacks-russia-putin-trump-economy/index.html

[vii] https://www.globalreinsurance.com/ransomware-dont-pay-urges-uk-government/1437486.article

You may also like

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter

The transition to post-quantum cryptography is not a future problem — it is a present one. The threat of adversaries harvesting encrypted data today for decryption once quantum computing matures means that organizations with long-lived data and systems are already exposed. Waiting for cryptographically relevant quantum computers to arrive before acting is not a viable risk management strategy.



Exposure is not uniform across sectors. Financial services, government and defense, operational technology, and healthcare face the sharpest quantum risk, driven by decades-long data retention obligations, slow system replacement cycles, and the societal consequences of cryptographic failure. For these sectors, PQC readiness has moved from best practice to strategic imperative.



Globally, the direction of travel is clear. The United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Singapore, and Australia have each established structured PQC transition frameworks, with mandatory deadlines converging around the late 2020s and 2030. Organizations operating across jurisdictions should expect compounding compliance requirements and align migration plans accordingly.



At the same time, the geopolitical dimension of PQC standardization is becoming increasingly salient. The emergence of a “splinternet” infrastructure, characterized by regionally fragmented digital ecosystems, suggests that cryptographic standards diverge along political and strategic lines. As a result, organizations must not only manage technical migration but also navigate a politically charged landscape in which interoperability, regulatory alignment, and long-term cryptographic agility become critical strategic considerations.



This paper offers a comparative overview of regional PQC transition frameworks and identifies the business and systemic risks associated with quantum-vulnerable cryptography, providing insights for organizations preparing for the transition to post-quantum cryptography. Overall, PQC migration is a strategic transformation, not a technical patch. Cryptographic inventory, governance structures, crypto-agility, and supply chain engagement are as central to success as algorithm selection — and organizations that treat PQC readiness as an architectural and organizational challenge will be best positioned as quantum risks continue to mature.
April 07, 2026
•
A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition

The Charter of Trust is taking decisive steps to secure our digital future in the quantum era. As quantum computing advances, the risks to today’s cryptographic systems grow ever more urgent. Our dedicated working group is leading the way in raising awareness, promoting standards-based migration, and fostering collaboration across industries, governments, and academia. Together, we are committed to a proactive, well-coordinated, and risk-driven transition to post-quantum cryptography—ensuring digital trust and resilience for generations to come. Discover our vision and join us as we shape a secure digital world for the quantum age.
November 03, 2026
•
Read the Charter's contribution to the European Commission's public consultation on the Digital Omnibus Package
icon Artificial Intelligence

Read the Charter's contribution to the European Commission's public consultation on the Digital Omnibus Package

The rapid expansion of EU digital regulation has strengthened security, privacy, and trust, but it has also created overlapping obligations, inconsistent timelines, and administrative complexity. The Digital Omnibus Package provides a timely opportunity to streamline these rules, ensure greater coherence, and enable businesses to focus resources on resilience and innovation rather than redundant compliance tasks.
The Charter of Trust welcomes the Commission’s initiative to harmonize digital regulations across the EU, aiming to reduce administrative burdens while maintaining high standards of security and privacy. Representing the unified views of its Partners, this paper addresses all key legislation within the scope of the Digital Omnibus and offers comprehensive recommendations. It emphasizes the need for a unified incident reporting system, risk-based notification requirements, and fair compliance processes to minimize regulatory overlap. The Charter calls for clearer liability clauses, global recognition of certifications, and stronger supply chain security.
In data regulation, the Charter advocates ensuring alignment between the rules on data intermediation services under the DGA and B2B data sharing under the Data Act and extending exemptions to mid-cap companies, all while safeguarding trade secrets. For artificial intelligence, the paper recommends a phased approach to new requirements, integrated conformity assessments, harmonized compliance templates, and clear definitions, supported by sector-specific guidance and transparent AI categorization. The Charter also encourages the European Commission to ensure that ePrivacy reform is future-proof, fosters innovation, and reflects the needs of both businesses and consumers. Finally, it recommends robust security standards and cross-border recognition for the EU Business Wallet, with industry involvement in technical standards and integration with data access systems.
Collectively, these measures are designed to foster innovation, resilience, and trust in the EU’s digital landscape, allowing businesses to thrive in a coherent and future-ready regulatory environment.
October 14, 2025
•