By Sudhir Ethiraj, Global Head of Cybersecurity Office, TÜV SÜD and
Dr. Angelika Steinacker, CTO Identity & Access Management, IBM Security Services EMEA

Security right from the start

The principle of Security by Default is focused on considering security to be built in and up and running from the start. This means including security considerations  into a design of a product and  the underlying processes and even when formulating policies for an organization at large instead of security being an add-on feature at the end of the process before going to production.

The rapid increase in digitization today, especially accelerated by the pandemic situation, has led to a tremendous increase in the attack surface. Therefore, there is a need to consider the Security by Default principle as a fundamental need to ensure adequate levels of security in society.

The Charter of Trust aims to increase cybersecurity levels in  society via collaboration between its member companies across industries and associated partners and has defined 10 Principles to achieve this goal. One of the 10 Principles is the principle of security by default. The Charter Taskforce on Security by Default has been working on this principle for the past three years , compiling baseline requirements and creating explanatory documents on what it means to adopt security by default.

Security by Design vs Security by Default

The concept of “Security by Design” is quite familiar. It means to include security features and capabilities into products and services when designing and producing those products and services. “Security by Design” is a basic requirement and has improved the security of products and services tremendously.

The concept “Security by Default” goes a step further: The security and capabilities of a product or service are active from the beginning. This means that no explicit activation is necessary since this can be forgotten or neglected in some cases. It is especially helpful and necessary in devices used by people not that familiar with security features, e.g. in IoT devices like smart bulbs or smart watches.

Furthermore, “Security by Default” aims at maintaining the security properties during operation and over the lifetime of a product or service. One of the basic requirements for achieving “Security by Default” is therefore that the security properties must be tested accordingly, i.e. under real operating conditions.

Design vs reality

“Security by Default” can really make a difference if security features are sufficient, enabled and productive for the lifetime of a product or service. The need for Security by Default as stated above can be seen in the incident that happened in 2019, where a feature was found in a series of connectivity chips used to connect billions of IoT devices like medical devices or smart meters. An attacker could use this feature in operation to gain control over the machine hosting it. Although these chips had several security features, they had not been sufficient to prevent attacks during operation. You can read about this here.

Charter of Trust drives Security by Default

CoT’s Principle 3 states: “Adopt the highest appropriate level of security and data protection and ensure that it is preconfigured into the design of products, functionalities, processes, technologies, operations, architectures, and business models.”

How do we work to achieve this?

To cover the broad spectrum of topics under security by default, we as a taskforce defined our scope of what we thought was essential to cover under Security by Default and would bring us nearer to the goal of increasing security levels. We therefore split the work into three phases and the taskforce members from companies collaborate to define baseline requirements for security by default. The three phases are:

  • Phase 1: Products, Functionalities and Technologies
  • Phase 2: Processes, Operations and Architectures (Ongoing)
  • Phase 3: Sharing of best practices for adoption of Security by Default

We finalized Phase 1 last year and have nearly finished Phase 2, so we are about to start the final phase. Stakeholders from different industries helped us get different perspectives on Security by Default while defining the scope and the baseline requirements to ensure that these requirements can truly be baseline and can be adopted across industries.

Taskforce resources / results so far

Outlook

With the Charter of Trust set out to increase cybersecurity in the society through collaboration between industry partners and exchange with political stakeholders, the taskforce is fully committed in executing this vision. The taskforce will soon publish the results for phase 2 on processes, operations and architectures with the baseline requirements and an explanatory document.

The next steps include moving to phase 3 focusing on  best practices to adopt Security by Default requirements from the member companies and getting the message across to different stakeholders in society and supporting a dialogue with stakeholders on these crucial topics. This will include several ways of sharing best practices, e.g. a webinar series with a panel format including an external audience, and articles and case studies showcasing where the requirements have been successfully adopted.

You may also like

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter

The transition to post-quantum cryptography is not a future problem — it is a present one. The threat of adversaries harvesting encrypted data today for decryption once quantum computing matures means that organizations with long-lived data and systems are already exposed. Waiting for cryptographically relevant quantum computers to arrive before acting is not a viable risk management strategy.



Exposure is not uniform across sectors. Financial services, government and defense, operational technology, and healthcare face the sharpest quantum risk, driven by decades-long data retention obligations, slow system replacement cycles, and the societal consequences of cryptographic failure. For these sectors, PQC readiness has moved from best practice to strategic imperative.



Globally, the direction of travel is clear. The United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Singapore, and Australia have each established structured PQC transition frameworks, with mandatory deadlines converging around the late 2020s and 2030. Organizations operating across jurisdictions should expect compounding compliance requirements and align migration plans accordingly.



At the same time, the geopolitical dimension of PQC standardization is becoming increasingly salient. The emergence of a “splinternet” infrastructure, characterized by regionally fragmented digital ecosystems, suggests that cryptographic standards diverge along political and strategic lines. As a result, organizations must not only manage technical migration but also navigate a politically charged landscape in which interoperability, regulatory alignment, and long-term cryptographic agility become critical strategic considerations.



This paper offers a comparative overview of regional PQC transition frameworks and identifies the business and systemic risks associated with quantum-vulnerable cryptography, providing insights for organizations preparing for the transition to post-quantum cryptography. Overall, PQC migration is a strategic transformation, not a technical patch. Cryptographic inventory, governance structures, crypto-agility, and supply chain engagement are as central to success as algorithm selection — and organizations that treat PQC readiness as an architectural and organizational challenge will be best positioned as quantum risks continue to mature.
April 07, 2026
•
A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition

The Charter of Trust is taking decisive steps to secure our digital future in the quantum era. As quantum computing advances, the risks to today’s cryptographic systems grow ever more urgent. Our dedicated working group is leading the way in raising awareness, promoting standards-based migration, and fostering collaboration across industries, governments, and academia. Together, we are committed to a proactive, well-coordinated, and risk-driven transition to post-quantum cryptography—ensuring digital trust and resilience for generations to come. Discover our vision and join us as we shape a secure digital world for the quantum age.
November 03, 2026
•
Read the Charter's contribution to the European Commission's public consultation on the Digital Omnibus Package
icon Artificial Intelligence

Read the Charter's contribution to the European Commission's public consultation on the Digital Omnibus Package

The rapid expansion of EU digital regulation has strengthened security, privacy, and trust, but it has also created overlapping obligations, inconsistent timelines, and administrative complexity. The Digital Omnibus Package provides a timely opportunity to streamline these rules, ensure greater coherence, and enable businesses to focus resources on resilience and innovation rather than redundant compliance tasks.
The Charter of Trust welcomes the Commission’s initiative to harmonize digital regulations across the EU, aiming to reduce administrative burdens while maintaining high standards of security and privacy. Representing the unified views of its Partners, this paper addresses all key legislation within the scope of the Digital Omnibus and offers comprehensive recommendations. It emphasizes the need for a unified incident reporting system, risk-based notification requirements, and fair compliance processes to minimize regulatory overlap. The Charter calls for clearer liability clauses, global recognition of certifications, and stronger supply chain security.
In data regulation, the Charter advocates ensuring alignment between the rules on data intermediation services under the DGA and B2B data sharing under the Data Act and extending exemptions to mid-cap companies, all while safeguarding trade secrets. For artificial intelligence, the paper recommends a phased approach to new requirements, integrated conformity assessments, harmonized compliance templates, and clear definitions, supported by sector-specific guidance and transparent AI categorization. The Charter also encourages the European Commission to ensure that ePrivacy reform is future-proof, fosters innovation, and reflects the needs of both businesses and consumers. Finally, it recommends robust security standards and cross-border recognition for the EU Business Wallet, with industry involvement in technical standards and integration with data access systems.
Collectively, these measures are designed to foster innovation, resilience, and trust in the EU’s digital landscape, allowing businesses to thrive in a coherent and future-ready regulatory environment.
October 14, 2025
•