To increase the overall level of security, security should be “built in” and considered from the very beginning. Therefore, the Charter of Trust defined “Security by Default” as one of its ten key principles.

By Sudhir Ethiraj, Global Lead, Cyber Security Strategy & Charter of Trust, TÜV SÜD

With the exponential growth of digitization in our everyday lives, there is also a potential widening of the attack surface. This fuels up the need to consider the principle of “Security by Design” or “Security by Default”. In other words: To increase the security level, security should be “built in” and considered from the very beginning.

The Charter of Trust defined Security by Default as one of its ten key principles. The objective: To adopt the highest appropriate level of security and data protection and ensure that it is preconfigured into the design of products, functionalities, processes, technologies, operations, architectures, and business models. It involves taking security into account right from the design phase. This helps avoid potential vulnerabilities, cyber risks and the costs associated with those risks.

Security by Default – end to end view

The principle should encompass more than just a product. It should include the processes behind the underlying architectures and the operations that enable the processes. This helps incorporate security aspects right from the outset considering a broad systemic view rather than having a narrow focus in scope. This could range from anywhere between enabling basic security trainings for the employees of an organization to following secure development principles to having a proper cyber risk management in place.

A collective responsibility

The concept of security by default also demands an immense amount of commitment from various stakeholders. It is therefore a collective responsibility of multiple stakeholders ranging from product managers to experts who are responsible for internal cyber security of an organization and to normal employees who need a basic amount of cyber security awareness. This collective responsibility must be anchored at the top of an organization. This is demonstrated very well with the work done at the Charter of Trust where we have companies across industries join hands to define what they see and perceive as necessary yardsticks to achieve Security by Default.

Addressing harmonization

We also live in a world, where standards and laws are currently being developed to address this. Within the Charter principle of “Security by Default”, we also look at the global standards and best practices which have been written from sometimes very different yet good perspectives and try to harmonize them by creation of the so-called “baseline cyber security requirements”. These are then aimed to enhance the Cyber Security stance of organizations who are currently starting out to ensure cyber security.

Ensuring Security by Default – Verification

These requirements also need to be verifiable in order to make sure that regular monitoring and audit processes can take place to measure the success of adoption and compliance to these requirements. It is not just enough to put down requirements, but it is equally important to follow them.

The current state of play, proves very often that the very basic pieces of the puzzle are still missing when it comes to security. This has been proven time and again, especially in connection to the recent attacks on hospitals and PPE manufacturers during the COVID crisis. Lack of basic security policies in place can have massive repercussions. These repercussions go beyond just the organizations being targeted and sometimes can have an impact at a global level.

Therefore, ensuring security by default from a systemic perspective is a great opportunity to get started in security and enabling organizations to tackle any sort of security challenges that may arise and help manage the security risks in the most effective manner.

Learn more about the Charter of Trust Principle 3 Baseline Requirements for products, functionalities and technologies here.

You may also like

Charter of Trust launches Cyber Deterrence in the private sector
icon Cyber Deterrence

Charter of Trust launches Cyber Deterrence in the private sector

The Charter of Trust has launched its Cyber Deterrence Working Group to address a central gap in today’s cybersecurity landscape: the disconnect between strong defensive investments and the persistent economic attractiveness of cybercrime. The group brings together industry partners to develop and validate practical deterrence methods that raise attacker cost and risk across sectors and borders.
June 30, 2026
•
Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter

The transition to post-quantum cryptography is not a future problem — it is a present one. The threat of adversaries harvesting encrypted data today for decryption once quantum computing matures means that organizations with long-lived data and systems are already exposed. Waiting for cryptographically relevant quantum computers to arrive before acting is not a viable risk management strategy.



Exposure is not uniform across sectors. Financial services, government and defense, operational technology, and healthcare face the sharpest quantum risk, driven by decades-long data retention obligations, slow system replacement cycles, and the societal consequences of cryptographic failure. For these sectors, PQC readiness has moved from best practice to strategic imperative.



Globally, the direction of travel is clear. The United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Singapore, and Australia have each established structured PQC transition frameworks, with mandatory deadlines converging around the late 2020s and 2030. Organizations operating across jurisdictions should expect compounding compliance requirements and align migration plans accordingly.



At the same time, the geopolitical dimension of PQC standardization is becoming increasingly salient. The emergence of a “splinternet” infrastructure, characterized by regionally fragmented digital ecosystems, suggests that cryptographic standards diverge along political and strategic lines. As a result, organizations must not only manage technical migration but also navigate a politically charged landscape in which interoperability, regulatory alignment, and long-term cryptographic agility become critical strategic considerations.



This paper offers a comparative overview of regional PQC transition frameworks and identifies the business and systemic risks associated with quantum-vulnerable cryptography, providing insights for organizations preparing for the transition to post-quantum cryptography. Overall, PQC migration is a strategic transformation, not a technical patch. Cryptographic inventory, governance structures, crypto-agility, and supply chain engagement are as central to success as algorithm selection — and organizations that treat PQC readiness as an architectural and organizational challenge will be best positioned as quantum risks continue to mature.
April 07, 2026
•
A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition

The Charter of Trust is taking decisive steps to secure our digital future in the quantum era. As quantum computing advances, the risks to today’s cryptographic systems grow ever more urgent. Our dedicated working group is leading the way in raising awareness, promoting standards-based migration, and fostering collaboration across industries, governments, and academia. Together, we are committed to a proactive, well-coordinated, and risk-driven transition to post-quantum cryptography—ensuring digital trust and resilience for generations to come. Discover our vision and join us as we shape a secure digital world for the quantum age.
November 13, 2026
•