As the United States begins a new chapter politically, this is an important moment for US leaders to evaluate and potentially reposition the nation’s cybersecurity policies. Cybersecurity should be among the top issues addressed first and consistently over the next four years.

This policy focus is essential as we continue to uncover and comprehend the impacts of the SolarWinds cyberattack. From bolstering the role of the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to taking critical steps to protect US infrastructure and supply chains to building a pipeline of advanced cybersecurity professionals, these critical policy areas must be central to the nation’s agenda going forward.

The members of the Charter of Trust – an international alliance of corporations and organizations committed to enabling trust in digital technologies – urge US government officials to align their policy priorities with several core principles that emphasize the need to prioritize cybersecurity laws, protections measures and education.

Ownership

Principle One of the Charter of Trust establishes that responsibility for cybersecurity should be appropriately designated throughout an organization with proper accountability in management. Aligned with that principle, we are encouraged by congressional action, via the recently passed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which creates a “National Cyber Director” role within the White House.[1]  We expect this new leadership role will pave the way for improved and streamlined threat intelligence with sharing of information across government agencies and with industry. This same legislation expands the role and responsibilities of CISA, a crucial step in protecting critical infrastructure in the United States. We anticipate that the new US administration will continue to encourage expansion of CISA resources, responsibilities and partnership with the private sector moving forward. These are all positive developments that will strengthen US national security as well as the security of the economy and critical infrastructure. We encourage government leaders at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue to make cybersecurity an ongoing and sustained policy priority.

Supply Chain Security

Principle Two states that companies and – if necessary – governments must establish risk-based rules beyond the proposed Baseline Cybersecurity Supply Chain Requirements[2] to ensure adequate protection across the digital supply chain. For critical infrastructures such as the US power grid and other critical IoT solutions the Charter of Trust advocates for independent certification in its Principle Seven. As was observed in the recent high-profile SolarWinds attacks, third-party and fourth-party cyber risk management has never been more important. It is imperative for organizations to have visibility into the cybersecurity measures of their key vendors. Aligned to what we’ve developed in our white paper on supply chain security, the Charter of Trust is confident that CISA will continue and expand on its work as the nation’s cyber risk management advisor providing organizations with guidance and frameworks for assessing third-party risk. Tactically, this includes promoting standards across secure software development and engaging in a coordinated, improved approach to vulnerability management.

Education

Principle Six of the Charter calls on academia to expand dedicated cybersecurity courses in school curricula, helping to build a diverse talent base. There is a serious deficit in cyber talent pipeline, in large part due to the lack of educational opportunities. Additionally, there are known challenges in the cybersecurity field to properly identify, recruit and retain talent, especially women and minority groups. Meanwhile, estimates indicate there will be more than three million cybersecurity jobs unfilled just this year[3]. Recognizing the magnitude of the challenge, we encourage the administration to proactively address this shortfall through both creative and traditional means, including adjustments to immigration policy related to high-skilled cyber talent and providing dedicated funding to STEM education, especially in high schools and community colleges.

Security by default

Principle Three of the Charter calls for the adoption of the highest appropriate level of security and data protection, highlighting the need to ensure that security and data protection are preconfigured into the design of products, functionalities, processes, technologies, operations, architectures, and business models.  As industrial production – especially in the technology and mobility sectors – continues to recover in the wake of the pandemic, security by default is now more essential than ever.  We encourage and anticipate further discussion on device-based security standards – including the IoT Security Act of 2020 – when contemplating next steps in crafting more advanced, flexible cybersecurity principles.

International Norms and Leadership

Perhaps the most impactful cybersecurity actions government officials can undertake is to regain and reassert US leadership in cyberspace. We recognize that success will require global support and joint initiatives between industry, governments, academia and research organizations, as laid out in both Principle 10 of our Charter of Trust and its Joint Initiatives and Associate Partner Forum, which support a collaborative approach between these three important stakeholder groups. To also strengthen the global digital supply chain for the US industry harmonization of standards and requirements with other regions shall become a priority of the new administration.

 

Cybersecurity is at the core of national defense, future stability and economic growth. Its importance should not be underestimated or placed down the list of highest governmental priorities. The members of the Charter of Trust stand by to help inform and support these policy actions.

 

[1] Congressional backers cite cybersecurity provisions as they push Trump to sign defense bill – CNNPolitics

[2] Charter of Trust Baseline Cybersecurity Supply Chain Requirements

[3] The Mad Dash to Find a Cybersecurity Force – The New York Times (nytimes.com)

You may also like

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

Decrypting the Future: Global Timelines for PostQuantum Cryptography and why they matter

The transition to post-quantum cryptography is not a future problem — it is a present one. The threat of adversaries harvesting encrypted data today for decryption once quantum computing matures means that organizations with long-lived data and systems are already exposed. Waiting for cryptographically relevant quantum computers to arrive before acting is not a viable risk management strategy.



Exposure is not uniform across sectors. Financial services, government and defense, operational technology, and healthcare face the sharpest quantum risk, driven by decades-long data retention obligations, slow system replacement cycles, and the societal consequences of cryptographic failure. For these sectors, PQC readiness has moved from best practice to strategic imperative.



Globally, the direction of travel is clear. The United States, European Union, United Kingdom, Singapore, and Australia have each established structured PQC transition frameworks, with mandatory deadlines converging around the late 2020s and 2030. Organizations operating across jurisdictions should expect compounding compliance requirements and align migration plans accordingly.



At the same time, the geopolitical dimension of PQC standardization is becoming increasingly salient. The emergence of a “splinternet” infrastructure, characterized by regionally fragmented digital ecosystems, suggests that cryptographic standards diverge along political and strategic lines. As a result, organizations must not only manage technical migration but also navigate a politically charged landscape in which interoperability, regulatory alignment, and long-term cryptographic agility become critical strategic considerations.



This paper offers a comparative overview of regional PQC transition frameworks and identifies the business and systemic risks associated with quantum-vulnerable cryptography, providing insights for organizations preparing for the transition to post-quantum cryptography. Overall, PQC migration is a strategic transformation, not a technical patch. Cryptographic inventory, governance structures, crypto-agility, and supply chain engagement are as central to success as algorithm selection — and organizations that treat PQC readiness as an architectural and organizational challenge will be best positioned as quantum risks continue to mature.
April 07, 2026
•
A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition
icon Post-Quantum Cryptography

A Quantum Leap for Cybersecurity: The Charter of Trust’s PQC Ambition

The Charter of Trust is taking decisive steps to secure our digital future in the quantum era. As quantum computing advances, the risks to today’s cryptographic systems grow ever more urgent. Our dedicated working group is leading the way in raising awareness, promoting standards-based migration, and fostering collaboration across industries, governments, and academia. Together, we are committed to a proactive, well-coordinated, and risk-driven transition to post-quantum cryptography—ensuring digital trust and resilience for generations to come. Discover our vision and join us as we shape a secure digital world for the quantum age.
November 03, 2026
•
Read the Charter's contribution to the European Commission's public consultation on the Digital Omnibus Package
icon Artificial Intelligence

Read the Charter's contribution to the European Commission's public consultation on the Digital Omnibus Package

The rapid expansion of EU digital regulation has strengthened security, privacy, and trust, but it has also created overlapping obligations, inconsistent timelines, and administrative complexity. The Digital Omnibus Package provides a timely opportunity to streamline these rules, ensure greater coherence, and enable businesses to focus resources on resilience and innovation rather than redundant compliance tasks.
The Charter of Trust welcomes the Commission’s initiative to harmonize digital regulations across the EU, aiming to reduce administrative burdens while maintaining high standards of security and privacy. Representing the unified views of its Partners, this paper addresses all key legislation within the scope of the Digital Omnibus and offers comprehensive recommendations. It emphasizes the need for a unified incident reporting system, risk-based notification requirements, and fair compliance processes to minimize regulatory overlap. The Charter calls for clearer liability clauses, global recognition of certifications, and stronger supply chain security.
In data regulation, the Charter advocates ensuring alignment between the rules on data intermediation services under the DGA and B2B data sharing under the Data Act and extending exemptions to mid-cap companies, all while safeguarding trade secrets. For artificial intelligence, the paper recommends a phased approach to new requirements, integrated conformity assessments, harmonized compliance templates, and clear definitions, supported by sector-specific guidance and transparent AI categorization. The Charter also encourages the European Commission to ensure that ePrivacy reform is future-proof, fosters innovation, and reflects the needs of both businesses and consumers. Finally, it recommends robust security standards and cross-border recognition for the EU Business Wallet, with industry involvement in technical standards and integration with data access systems.
Collectively, these measures are designed to foster innovation, resilience, and trust in the EU’s digital landscape, allowing businesses to thrive in a coherent and future-ready regulatory environment.
October 14, 2025
•